Install JMP or JMP Genomics These instructions are for the latest release, JMP Pro 16 for the 2020-21 license term. Installation of versions 13, 14, and 15 use the same procedure as the one shown here, except for. JMP Group has received 51.28% “underperform” votes from our community. MarketBeat's community ratings are surveys of what our community members think about JMP Group and other stocks. Vote “Outperform” if you believe JMP will outperform the S&P 500 over the long term.
Drinking water services refers to the accessibility, availability and quality of the main source used by households for drinking, cooking, personal hygiene and other domestic uses
The new JMP ladder for drinking water
The JMP service ladders are used to benchmark and compare service levels across countries. These have been updated and expanded to facilitate enhanced global monitoring of drinking water, sanitation and hygiene. The new ladders build on the established improved/unimproved facility type classification, thereby providing continuity with past monitoring, and introduce new rungs with additional criteria relating to service levels.
Improved drinking water sources are those which, by nature of their design and construction, have the potential to deliver safe water. The JMP subdivides the population using improved sources into three groups according to the level of service provided. In order to meet the criteria for a safely managed drinking water service, people must use an improved source meeting three criteria:
- it should be accessible on premises,
- water should be available when needed, and
- the water supplied should be free from contamination.
If the improved source does not meet any one of these criteria but a round trip to collect water takes 30 minutes or less, then it will be classified as a basic drinking water service. If water collection from an improved source exceeds 30 minutes it will be categorised as a limited service. The JMP also differentiates populations using unimproved sources such as unprotected wells or springs, and populations drinking surface water collected directly from a river, dam, lake, stream or irrigation canal.
Drinking water ladder
Safely managed
Drinking water from an improved water source which is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination
Basic
Drinking water from an improved source, provided collection time is not more than 30 minutes for a roundtrip including queuing
Limited
Drinking water from an improved source for which collection time exceeds 30 minutes for a roundtrip including queuing
Unimproved
Drinking water from an unprotected dug well or unprotected spring
Surface water
Drinking water directly from a river, dam, lake, pond, stream, canal or irrigation canal
Note: Improved drinking water sources are those that have the potential to deliver safe water by nature of their design and construction, and include: piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, rainwater, and packaged or delivered water
Monitoring SDG targets related to drinking water
The Sustainable Development Goals include aspirational global targets to achieve universal access to basic services and to progressively improve the standard of WASH services by 2030 and the JMP is responsible for official reporting on corresponding global SDG indicators related to drinking water, sanitation and hygiene (see SDG Monitoring).
The JMP 2017 Thematic Report on Safely Managed Drinking Water considers the implications of SDG target 6.1, 'By 2030, achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all' and outlines JMP plans for enhanced monitoring of drinking water.
The first section of the report examines the SDG vision for universal access and the specific language used in the formulation of global targets. New ladders for monitoring drinking water services at home, at school and in health facilities are presented, together with proposals for enhanced monitoring of inequalities and affordability.
The second section examines the availability of data on the different elements of safely managed drinking water services and discusses the challenges associated with combining data from different sources in order to track the progressive elimination of inequalities and global progress towards SDG target 6.1.
Enhancing data collection through household surveys
Household surveys and censuses remain the primary source of information on the different types of facilities used by the population but information on service levels is also collected from administrative sources and regulators (see Data Sources).
The existing JMP core questions for household surveys have been widely used in national household surveys and censuses around the world and have contributed to improvements in the quality and comparability of data collected over the past decade. The JMP is now working closely with international household survey programmes to develop new questions and indicators for enhanced monitoring of drinking water services.
The JMP has collaborated with the UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) programme to pilot and field test new questions that address the availability and quality of drinking water. The sixth round of MICS surveys includes a standardised module for direct testing of water quality and updated questions on water, sanitation and hygiene. To date the JMP has supported over 10 countries to integrate water quality testing in national household surveys and many more are planned for 2017-2018 (see Water Quality Monitoring).
Integrating data from administrative sources and regulators
In order to monitor safely managed drinking water services the JMP will increasingly draws on a wider range of national data sources including regulators. During 2016 the JMP supported case studies exploring the integration of regulatory data with information from household surveys in Kenya and Italy. The JMP participated in the annual meeting of the regional association of drinking water regulators in Eastern and Southern Africa (ESAWAS) collected valuable data from the European Union’s Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. The JMP also worked with the World Bank’s IB-NET programme to integrate new SDG related information in the latest round of IB-NET data collection.
Related content
JMP (pronounced “jump”) Pro is statistical software made by SAS that enables users to easily explore and visualize data using a variety of tools for statistical analysis and interactive graphing.
Jmp The Label
My phone memory is full how do i clean it. JMP Pro can be used for research, development, and quality control applications and includes analytics for Six Sigma® and the design of experiments.
Jmp
Why use JMP Pro?
While JMP Pro is capable of advanced analytics, the software assumes that the user only has a very basic background in statistics. Therefore, it is an ideal statistics package for students. JMP Pro assists the user in choosing correct analytic procedures and in interpreting results.
What if I am used to using SPSS, SAS, or Stata?
SPSS users will find JMP Pro ’s graphical “point and click” user interface familiar and easy to use. SAS users will appreciate the advanced graphing capabilities integrated into JMP Pro software. Stata users will also appreciate and easily adjust to using JMP Pro.
JMP Pro vs. SAS
Jmp Pro
SAS remains the best choice of software if you need to handle large amounts of data or want maximum flexibility in terms of programming and statistical analysis. JMP Pro provides a streamlined alternative for smaller jobs using the most popular types of analysis.
The JMP Pro user guide explains it like this, “When you are looking for an information delivery vehicle, sometimes you need a truck that can haul anything, every day, like SAS. But if you are out for a drive to go exploring, you might find it best to drive a small car, or even a sports car like JMP.”
Jmp.com
Compared to SAS, JMP Pro is easier to install, takes up less hard drive space, and requires less RAM. While JMP Pro is easy to learn and helps the user learn about statistics, SAS has a steep learning curve and requires more expertise.